![]() |
|
|||||||
| Register | FAQ | Hunting Pictures | Hunting Videos | Hunting News | Hunting Links | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
what they should of done was stick a wall of bone 4 inches into the jello, and then see how the bullets do
__________________
"If you ever go into the bush, there are grizzly bears lurking behind just about every bush, waiting to pounce, so you need a powerful gun, with huge bullets" - Gatehouse ~ 2004 |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Happiness is seeing the love shine in your child's eyes. |
|
||||
|
Can't load my .338 wm over 3000 at any time with 250's so I'm ok. And the 7mm rm and '06 don't see the 3000 mark either so I guess I'm ok there as well. I like the heavier bullets in all the calibres I shoot so no fear of hitting the higher machs with them. I still like the sub min. groups I get with the hornadys in all the calibres I shoot.
|
|
|||
|
A very interesting test,but one that only judges deer bullets(150) from a 308.I have seen other tests of heavier bullets where Accubond and Interbond flip-flop positions.I have seen in testing SSTs,that different bullet calibers and weights make a considerable difference.The 225 338 lost it's core where as the 165 308 worked slightly better than the same weight BT.
|