Western Canada Hunting Forums  

Go Back   Western Canada Hunting Forums > Hand-loading & Technical talk


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2007, 11:58 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Whitecourt Alberta
Posts: 43
Smile Hornady Bullets & Lands question

So Ive Reloaded quite a few Hornady SST's and for the most part Ive had Good success.

But my question here is directed on seating depth.

Is it Poor practice to just use the Ring area for seating depth?

Typically I seat my 243 and my 308 at around 1/2 way into the ring.

The Results are Fair. But I'm wondering with these bullets, Do they like to be seated further into the lands or is this ring a actual guideline?

Has anyone had Some success moving the bullets closer or further to the land's?

Do they like to jump or start in the lands .. things like this. just wondering as I start moving into longer range tests on the 243 what things I can do with these bullets. they have a decent BC for a 95grain 243 bullet and controlled expansion and seem to fly well.

Any info would be appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-27-2007, 07:46 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cold Lake,AB
Posts: 30
A good starting point is .050" off the land. So different bullets will give a different Cartridge overall lenght. There is a gauge made by stoney point (now sold by Hornady) that would tell you exactly how far with your bullets is the land.

If you check this post...check what I put there, http://huntshoot.coastangler.com/hun...ain.tsx-10591/

This is what i use and it does the same thing as the expensive gauge.

Hope that helps

Cheers
Gaetoune
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-27-2007, 11:44 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Whitecourt Alberta
Posts: 43
I understand this is how TSX like to shoot. wondering if that apply's to the SST's from hornady aswell. If so great.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-27-2007, 01:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: lower mainland
Posts: 285
The Stoney point gauge is the way to go IMO,

Are you measuring with a caliper after you "seat them 1/2 way into the ring"?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2007, 12:14 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cold Lake,AB
Posts: 30
As a matter of fact, I've been testing hornady SST and Barnes Tsx and so far not a lot of difference. Same loads does not make a lot of change, .025" diff in the worst case i've shot.

I have not tested a lot of loads but for the 3 I have tested they group almost the same (0.025" at the most), Good for hunting bullets.

Cheers
Gaetoune
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2007, 09:00 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vernon BC
Posts: 534
Barnes recommend the .050 leade to address pressure issues, due to the harder construction of their bullets. They don't deform/conform to the rifling as easily as other do.
Some other types/brands of bullets need no lead, can start out touching the lands. Only experimenting will say what works best for your rifle/bullet/load combo. The limiting factor to c.o.l., is usually magazine length, and how they feed. Unless you are running single shot.
__________________
http://www.wildsheepsociety.org/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0